Protests 978254-G of M. Pressner & Co.

5 Cust. Ct. 353
United States Customs Court·Decided October 11, 1940·No. No. 44508·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 39426 bone lemon picks were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 978254-G of M. Pressner & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 353 (cusc 1940).

5 Cust. Ct. 353 (Protests 978254-G of M. Pressner & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)