Protests 976842-G of Hoffritz, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 976842-G of Hoffritz, Inc.

4 Cust. Ct. 456

United States Customs Court·Decided April 25, 1940·No. No. 43583·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Selsi v. United States (C. D. 147) and United States v. Oppleman (25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) aneroid barometers were held dutiable as machines at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372. Thermometers and weather sets similar to those the subject of Abstract 42039 were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Selsi v. United States (C. D. 147) and United States v. Oppleman (25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) aneroid barometers were held dutiable as machines at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372. Thermometers and weather sets similar to those the subject of Abstract 42039 were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339.

Protests 976842-G of Hoffritz, Inc., 4 Cust. Ct. 456 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 456 (Protests 976842-G of Hoffritz, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.