Protests 971619-G of E. Leitz, Inc.
3 Cust. Ct. 460
Opinion
Opinion by
On the agreed facts the cameras and parts in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551. United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United States v. Zeiss (id. 145, T. D. 48624) followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 971619-G of E. Leitz, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 460 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 460 (Protests 971619-G of E. Leitz, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.