Home/U.S. Customs Court/Protests 971474-G of Shackman

Protests 971474-G of Shackman

10 Cust. Ct. 420
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1943
DocketNo. 48110
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 420 (Protests 971474-G of Shackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 971474-G of Shackman, 10 Cust. Ct. 420 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following Schmidt v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690) it was held that countervailing duty under section 303 is not applicable to the merchandise covered by stipulation of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 188 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-971474-g-of-shackman-cusc-1943.