Protests 968775-G of B. D. Eisendrath Tanning Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 430
United States Customs Court·Decided March 22, 1940·No. No. 43417·Published

Opinion

[431]*431Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Inasmuch as the collector failed to send the importers a notice of the advance it was held that the appraisement is not complete. Ti v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 268, C. D. 248) cited. The liquidation was set aside so that the appraisement may be completed. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 968775-G of B. D. Eisendrath Tanning Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 430 (cusc 1940).

4 Cust. Ct. 430 (Protests 968775-G of B. D. Eisendrath Tanning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ti Hang Lung & Co. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 268 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)