Protests 968652-G of Samuel Barotz & Co.
4 Cust. Ct. 358
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 358 (Protests 968652-G of Samuel Barotz & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protests 968652-G of Samuel Barotz & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 358 (cusc 1940).
Opinion
Opinion by
It was agreed that the merchandise consists of imitation pearl bead caps similar to those the subject of Cohn v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 380, C. D. 161). The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 21.8 (f) as glass articles was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 380 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-968652-g-of-samuel-barotz-co-cusc-1940.