Protests 967258-G of Bamberger
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 487 (Protests 967258-G of Bamberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles and fabrics in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles and filet laces at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) followed; and (3) artificial flowers similar to those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cust. Ct. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-967258-g-of-bamberger-cusc-1938.