Protests 962567-G of N. Minami & Co.
5 Cust. Ct. 414
Opinion
Opinion by
From the exhibit the court was satisfied that the ■electrical element or device therein may not be considered as a nonessential feature in the article and that it constitutes a conspicuous and prominent part of the wreath. On the authority of Minami v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 307, C. D. 72) the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 353 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 962567-G of N. Minami & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 414 (Protests 962567-G of N. Minami & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Globe Lighting Fixture Mfg. Co. v. United States
16 Cust. Ct. 31 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)