Protests 957506-G/88071 of Chicago Mail Order Co.
This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 701 (Protests 957506-G/88071 of Chicago Mail Order Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was conceded that the outer covering of the baby footwear in question is one piece. There is a tuck at approximately the place where the sole and upper would naturally be joined, but it is one continuous piece of material, which was held to distinguish it from United States v. Feltman (22 C. C. P. A. 637, T. D. 47616) and United States v. Kahn (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 57, T. D. 40881). The court, being of the opinion that it was not the intent of Congress to except from paragraph 1529 footwear upon which there is visible only a mock line of.demarcation between the soles and uppers, overruled the protests.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Cust. Ct. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-957506-g88071-of-chicago-mail-order-co-cusc-1939.