Protests 954382-G of Eimer & Amend

5 Cust. Ct. 282
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1940
DocketNo. 44126
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 282 (Protests 954382-G of Eimer & Amend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 954382-G of Eimer & Amend, 5 Cust. Ct. 282 (cusc 1940).

Opinion

[283]*283Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The merchandise consisted of tiny glass balls about the size of a buckshot. From the testimony it was found that it is not scientific, chemical, or laboratory glassware as classified by the collector, apparently in view of United States v. Boker, 90 Fed. 804. The claim at SO percent under paragraph 230 (d) as manufactures of glass, not specially provided for, was therefore sustained. United States v. Harding Co. (21 C. C. P. A. 307, T. D. 46830), Lassky v. United States (id. 201, T. D. 46727), and United States v. Embossing Co. (3 Ct. Cust. Appl. 220, T. D. 32536) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Boker
90 F. 804 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cust. Ct. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-954382-g-of-eimer-amend-cusc-1940.