Protests 948785-G/87811 of A. Stein & Co.

5 Cust. Ct. 269
United States Customs Court·Decided June 28, 1940·No. No. 44054·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the entire record, including an examination and inspection of the samples, it was held that the plaintiffs did not establish a prima facie case. The protests were therefore overruled, the court saying: “In the light of the decision of our appellate court in the case of Robinson-Goodman v. United [270]*270States, 17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473, the testimony offered by the plaintiffs herein might be considered as establishing a commercial designation for the-involved merchandise different from the common meaning applicable thereto.. However, since the above decision does not appear to be in harmony with other-decisions on the question of commercial designation, we do not feel justified or warranted in basing our decision herein on commercial designation.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 948785-G/87811 of A. Stein & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 269 (cusc 1940).

5 Cust. Ct. 269 (Protests 948785-G/87811 of A. Stein & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.