Protests 948785-G/87811 of A. Stein & Co.
This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 269 (Protests 948785-G/87811 of A. Stein & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On the entire record, including an examination and inspection of the samples, it was held that the plaintiffs did not establish a prima facie case. The protests were therefore overruled, the court saying: “In the light of the decision of our appellate court in the case of Robinson-Goodman v. United [270]*270States, 17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473, the testimony offered by the plaintiffs herein might be considered as establishing a commercial designation for the-involved merchandise different from the common meaning applicable thereto.. However, since the above decision does not appear to be in harmony with other-decisions on the question of commercial designation, we do not feel justified or warranted in basing our decision herein on commercial designation.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Cust. Ct. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-948785-g87811-of-a-stein-co-cusc-1940.