Protests 946617-G of Amemiya

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 946617-G of Amemiya

4 Cust. Ct. 449

United States Customs Court·Decided April 19, 1940·No. No. 43536·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (24 id. 114, T. D. 48415), and Abstracts 40865, 42779, 41243, 40203, and 28984, vases, savings banks, pen stands, and boxes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (24 id. 114, T. D. 48415), and Abstracts 40865, 42779, 41243, 40203, and 28984, vases, savings banks, pen stands, and boxes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.

Protests 946617-G of Amemiya, 4 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 449 (Protests 946617-G of Amemiya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.