Protests 946617-G of Amemiya

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 946617-G of Amemiya

4 Cust. Ct. 449

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 19, 1940

DocketNo. 43536

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 449 (Protests 946617-G of Amemiya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 946617-G of Amemiya, 4 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (24 id. 114, T. D. 48415), and Abstracts 40865, 42779, 41243, 40203, and 28984, vases, savings banks, pen stands, and boxes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (24 id. 114, T. D. 48415), and Abstracts 40865, 42779, 41243, 40203, and 28984, vases, savings banks, pen stands, and boxes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-946617-g-of-amemiya-cusc-1940.