Protests 942393-G of Carl Zeiss, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 942393-G of Carl Zeiss, Inc.

4 Cust. Ct. 398

United States Customs Court·Decided February 19, 1940·No. No. 43240·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Zeiss (26 C. C. P. A. 182, C. A. D. 15) the Starmorbi telescope was held dutiable at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 228, Tariff Act of 1930, as telescopes. Filters for Nordenson camera were held dutiable as parts of cameras at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 on the authority of United States v. Zeiss (27 C. C. P. A. 12, C. A. D. 54).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Zeiss (26 C. C. P. A. 182, C. A. D. 15) the Starmorbi telescope was held dutiable at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 228, Tariff Act of 1930, as telescopes. Filters for Nordenson camera were held dutiable as parts of cameras at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 on the authority of United States v. Zeiss (27 C. C. P. A. 12, C. A. D. 54).

Protests 942393-G of Carl Zeiss, Inc., 4 Cust. Ct. 398 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 398 (Protests 942393-G of Carl Zeiss, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.