Protests 941837-G of M. Pressner & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 941837-G of M. Pressner & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 344

United States Customs Court·Decided August 8, 1939·No. No. 41906·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) siren whistles and horns at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 39948 and 40480 followed; (2) tin kazoos similar to those the subject of Abstract 32264 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; (3) paper bells like those the subject of Kresge v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 48975) at 45 percent under paragraph 397; and (4) opera glasses similar to those passed upon in Woolworth v. United States (C. D. 74) at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) siren whistles and horns at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 39948 and 40480 followed; (2) tin kazoos similar to those the subject of Abstract 32264 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; (3) paper bells like those the subject of Kresge v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 48975) at 45 percent under paragraph 397; and (4) opera glasses similar to those passed upon in Woolworth v. United States (C. D. 74) at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement.

Protests 941837-G of M. Pressner & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 344 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 344 (Protests 941837-G of M. Pressner & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.