Protests 937098-K of New York Merchandise Co.

17 Cust. Ct. 171
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 19, 1946
DocketNo. 51269
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 171 (Protests 937098-K of New York Merchandise Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 937098-K of New York Merchandise Co., 17 Cust. Ct. 171 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom the uncontradicted evidence it was held that the brass-base shells similar in all material respects to those the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) and the Christmas tree lamps the same as those involved in New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (16 Cust. Ct. 148, C. D. 1003) are dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs. Marcel irons similar to those the subject of Abstract 38680 were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
8 Cust. Ct. 209 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
16 Cust. Ct. 148 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Cust. Ct. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-937098-k-of-new-york-merchandise-co-cusc-1946.