Protests 937067-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co.
This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 284 (Protests 937067-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[285]*285Opinion by
The merchandise consisted- of hollow glass receptacles' or containers and an apparatus for spraying liquids. The record showed that the receptacle and spraying apparatus are designed to be used together as an atomizer. They were therefore held dutiable as an entirety. On the record and following Rice v. United States (T. D. 48760) the merchandise was held dutiable as glass articles at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f). United States v. Sutherland (21 C. C. P. A. 264, T. D. 46790), Stegemann v. United States (4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26, T. D. 33220), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 47951) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Cust. Ct. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-937067-g-of-n-y-merchandise-co-cusc-1940.