Protests 93660-K of Hurley Johnson Corp.
This text of 14 Cust. Ct. 239 (Protests 93660-K of Hurley Johnson Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[240]*240Opinion by
At the trial the records in Stein v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 443, C. D. 511) and Abstract 49359 were admitted in evidence and made a part of the record herein. Plaintiff’s witness, when shown the sample of a Tam O’Shanter octagon block, a part of the record in Abstract 49359, testified that the stones his company imports are identical, except for size, and that Tam O’Shanter rectangular polishing blocks also are the same, except for size and shape; that such rectangular polishing blocks of the 12 to 20 pounds selection include quite a range of sizes and as'an estimate at least 20 percent of such items would be 8 inches or less in each dimension; and that the octagon stones on the invoice described as measuring 8 inches would not include any stones measuring greater than that dimension. In view of the uncontradicted testimony and following the cases cited it was held that the Tam O’Shanter octagon polishing blocks measuring 6" by 7" by 4", or 8" by 4", and 20 percent 'of each item of the Tam O’Shanter rectangular polishing blocks, 12 to 20 pounds, established as measuring 8 inches or less, were entitled to free entry under paragraph 1692, as claimed. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Cust. Ct. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-93660-k-of-hurley-johnson-corp-cusc-1945.