Protests 917421-G of Emy

3 Cust. Ct. 437
United States Customs Court·Decided October 13, 1939·No. No. 42416·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

The evidence showed that the merchandise consists of oil extracted from the livers of swordfish and tuna fish by grinding, adding a caustic solution, agitating the mass and allowing it to remain overnight, adding hot water, and centrifuging the mixture which mechanically separates the oil, water, and solids from one another. They are blended with other fish liver oils, put into capsules, and sold for medicinal use. The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was sustained on the authority of Andrews v. United States (T. D. 49190).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 917421-G of Emy, 3 Cust. Ct. 437 (cusc 1939).

3 Cust. Ct. 437 (Protests 917421-G of Emy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alaska Fish Oil Extractors, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 231 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
15 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1945)
Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 415 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)