Protests 911050-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.
7 Cust. Ct. 322
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Rockingham earthenware, the same as that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 911050-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co., 7 Cust. Ct. 322 (cusc 1941).
7 Cust. Ct. 322 (Protests 911050-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)