Protests 910521-G of Leonard Levin Co.
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 396 (Protests 910521-G of Leonard Levin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[397]*397Opinion by
The sole question at issue here is whether these beads are imitation precious or semiprecious stones. There was some evidence that after importation beads like those in question are made to imitate pearls. This was held to be immaterial. It is the condition as imported that controls the classification of the merchandise. United States v. International Forwarding Co. (15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 198, T. D. 42235) and G. A. 8886 (T. D. 40463) cited. It was found that some of the merchandise imitates white agate or chalcedony, white onyx, or white jade — all semiprecious stones — and others resemble rock crystal. They were therefore found to be in imitation of semiprecious stones and the protests were overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cust. Ct. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-910521-g-of-leonard-levin-co-cusc-1938.