Protests 906320-G of Lansen-Naeve Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 906320-G of Lansen-Naeve Corp.

3 Cust. Ct. 506

United States Customs Court·Decided December 15, 1939·No. No. 42869·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Oppleman (25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) and Abstract 42039 aneroid barometers and hair hygrometers were held dutiable at 27M percent under paragraph 372, and thermometers and weather sets were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Altimeters were held dutiable as surveying instruments at 40 percent under paragraph 360. American Paulin System v. United States (T. D. 49221) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Oppleman (25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) and Abstract 42039 aneroid barometers and hair hygrometers were held dutiable at 27M percent under paragraph 372, and thermometers and weather sets were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Altimeters were held dutiable as surveying instruments at 40 percent under paragraph 360. American Paulin System v. United States (T. D. 49221) followed.

Protests 906320-G of Lansen-Naeve Corp., 3 Cust. Ct. 506 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 506 (Protests 906320-G of Lansen-Naeve Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.