Protests 868941-G of Lord

7 Cust. Ct. 335
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1941
DocketNo. 46677
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 335 (Protests 868941-G of Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 868941-G of Lord, 7 Cust. Ct. 335 (cusc 1941).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the evidence produced at the trial that some of the merchandise in question “is of the same general character as the merchandise in suit 984394-G” the silk articles in question were held dutiable under paragraph 1209 as follows: (1) handkerchiefs or mufflers, hemmed or.hein-stitched, at 60 percent; (2) hemmed mufflers, hand-blocked printed, at 35 percent in view of T. D. 49753; (3) unhemmed handkerchiefs at 55 percent; and (4) other hemmed handkerchiefs at 45 percent in view of T. D. 49753. It was stipulated between counsel that certain of the items consist of articles in part of silk or artificial silk, or both; these were held not subject to countervailing duty, following Bullocks v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bullocks, Inc. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 110 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cust. Ct. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-868941-g-of-lord-cusc-1941.