Protests 8669-K of Anco Import Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 8669-K of Anco Import Corp.

10 Cust. Ct. 356

United States Customs Court·Decided December 18, 1942·No. No. 47819·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.

Protests 8669-K of Anco Import Corp., 10 Cust. Ct. 356 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 356 (Protests 8669-K of Anco Import Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.