Protests 85237-K of T. Dragani & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 85237-K of T. Dragani & Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 384

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 20, 1942

DocketNo. 47403

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 384 (Protests 85237-K of T. Dragani & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 85237-K of T. Dragani & Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 384 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

These protests were submitted upon a stipulation entered into between counsel. In view of this agreement and following Pistorino v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 127), Union Importing Co. v. United States (id. 911, Reap. Dec. 4558), and Dragani v. United States (id. 999, Reap. Dec. 4592) cited therein, the claim that the appraisements were illegal and that the liquidations based on“such appraisements were also illegal and void was sustained. It was therefore held that duty should be assessed upon the entered value.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

These protests were submitted upon a stipulation entered into between counsel. In view of this agreement and following Pistorino v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 127), Union Importing Co. v. United States (id. 911, Reap. Dec. 4558), and Dragani v. United States (id. 999, Reap. Dec. 4592) cited therein, the claim that the appraisements were illegal and that the liquidations based on“such appraisements were also illegal and void was sustained. It was therefore held that duty should be assessed upon the entered value.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Cust. Ct. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-85237-k-of-t-dragani-co-cusc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack