Protests 846031-G of Chong Kee Jan

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 846031-G of Chong Kee Jan

11 Cust. Ct. 301

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 1, 1943

DocketNo. 48935

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 846031-G of Chong Kee Jan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 846031-G of Chong Kee Jan, 11 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bak hop, lotus nuts (hoi shin lien, hoi pak lin), sui sit, wai san (stick), sar sum (uncut), lo hon qua, yuen yuk, and mok qua were held entitled to free entry as claimed following Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), and wai san (sliced), yuk chuk, and sar sum (cut) were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34, Tariff Act of 1930 or Tariff Act of 1922, as claimed, following said C. D. 372.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bak hop, lotus nuts (hoi shin lien, hoi pak lin), sui sit, wai san (stick), sar sum (uncut), lo hon qua, yuen yuk, and mok qua were held entitled to free entry as claimed following Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), and wai san (sliced), yuk chuk, and sar sum (cut) were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34, Tariff Act of 1930 or Tariff Act of 1922, as claimed, following said C. D. 372.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-846031-g-of-chong-kee-jan-cusc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack