Protests 846016-G of Suen Mark & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 846016-G of Suen Mark & Co.

12 Cust. Ct. 296

United States Customs Court·Decided April 20, 1944·No. No. 49358·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise in question was found to contain salt and therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise in question was found to contain salt and therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Protests 846016-G of Suen Mark & Co., 12 Cust. Ct. 296 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

12 Cust. Ct. 296 (Protests 846016-G of Suen Mark & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.