Protests 84541-G of Gimbel Bros.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (Protests 84541-G of Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered articles and embroidered-net handkerchiefs similar to the merchandise the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365 T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-84541-g-of-gimbel-bros-cusc-1939.