Protests 836102-G of Jaeger

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 836102-G of Jaeger

3 Cust. Ct. 372

United States Customs Court·Decided September 1, 1939·No. No. 42045·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found that the merchandise is composed of 35“ percent protein and 65 percent raw silk and is used by surgeons for sewing up-wounds. Under .the decision in United States v. Barham (26 C. C. P. A. 83, T. D. 49614) it was held that this merchandise is not “Sewing silk, twist, floss, and. silk threads or yarns of any description, made from raw silk,” but was properly-classified as a manufacture of silk under-paragraph 211. On the record presented' the protests were overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found that the merchandise is composed of 35“ percent protein and 65 percent raw silk and is used by surgeons for sewing up-wounds. Under .the decision in United States v. Barham (26 C. C. P. A. 83, T. D. 49614) it was held that this merchandise is not “Sewing silk, twist, floss, and. silk threads or yarns of any description, made from raw silk,” but was properly-classified as a manufacture of silk under-paragraph 211. On the record presented' the protests were overruled.

Protests 836102-G of Jaeger, 3 Cust. Ct. 372 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 372 (Protests 836102-G of Jaeger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.