Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.

5 Cust. Ct. 301

United States Customs Court·Decided September 4, 1940·No. No. 44247·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Rockingham-ware similar to that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. Tennis rackets of the same character as those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were -held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1302 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Rockingham-ware similar to that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. Tennis rackets of the same character as those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were -held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1302 as claimed.

Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros., 5 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

5 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related