Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.

5 Cust. Ct. 301

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 4, 1940

DocketNo. 44247

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 834451-G of Butler Bros., 5 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Rockingham-ware similar to that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. Tennis rackets of the same character as those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were -held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1302 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Rockingham-ware similar to that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. Tennis rackets of the same character as those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were -held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1302 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-834451-g-of-butler-bros-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack