Protests 829010-G of Scaramelli & Co.
3 Cust. Ct. 390
Opinion
Opinion by
In view of the evidence and the agreed statement of facts it was held that the inedible covering of the cheese in question is properly the subject of allowance as tare under the principle announced in Kraft v. United States (T. D. 47955) and Locatelli v. United States (T. D. 48284). The protests were therefore sustained in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 829010-G of Scaramelli & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 390 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 390 (Protests 829010-G of Scaramelli & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.