Protests 827281-G of Bailey, Green & Elger

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 827281-G of Bailey, Green & Elger

12 Cust. Ct. 243

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 1944

DocketNo. 49132

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cust. Ct. 243 (Protests 827281-G of Bailey, Green & Elger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 827281-G of Bailey, Green & Elger, 12 Cust. Ct. 243 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of embossed metal buttons similar to those the subject of United States v. [244]*244Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain of the items in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed. Others imported subsequent to the Czechoslovakian Trade Agreement (T. D. 49458) were held dutiable at 35 percent under the same paragraph and trade agreement, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of embossed metal buttons similar to those the subject of United States v. [244]*244Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain of the items in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed. Others imported subsequent to the Czechoslovakian Trade Agreement (T. D. 49458) were held dutiable at 35 percent under the same paragraph and trade agreement, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cust. Ct. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-827281-g-of-bailey-green-elger-cusc-1944.