Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co.

7 Cust. Ct. 325

United States Customs Court·Decided November 26, 1941·No. No. 46625·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The issue in these protests is the same as that involved in Wm. Prym of America v. United States (T. D. 43040), affirmed in United States v. Wm. Prym of America (17 C. C. P. A. 180, T. D. 43475). The evidence showed that the only notice of advance by the appraiser in these cases related to a per se advance in value of the electric-light bulbs in question; that no notice of dumping was issued by the appraiser; and that no dumping duty was assessable on the1 merchandise. Mitsui v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3828), Grand Gaslight v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3834), Sherwin-Williams v. United States (T. D. 47919), and Vulcan Match Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 398) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The issue in these protests is the same as that involved in Wm. Prym of America v. United States (T. D. 43040), affirmed in United States v. Wm. Prym of America (17 C. C. P. A. 180, T. D. 43475). The evidence showed that the only notice of advance by the appraiser in these cases related to a per se advance in value of the electric-light bulbs in question; that no notice of dumping was issued by the appraiser; and that no dumping duty was assessable on the1 merchandise. Mitsui v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3828), Grand Gaslight v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3834), Sherwin-Williams v. United States (T. D. 47919), and Vulcan Match Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 398) cited.

Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co., 7 Cust. Ct. 325 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

7 Cust. Ct. 325 (Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related