Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co.
This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 325 (Protests 822789-G of Empire Importing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The issue in these protests is the same as that involved in Wm. Prym of America v. United States (T. D. 43040), affirmed in United States v. Wm. Prym of America (17 C. C. P. A. 180, T. D. 43475). The evidence showed that the only notice of advance by the appraiser in these cases related to a per se advance in value of the electric-light bulbs in question; that no notice of dumping was issued by the appraiser; and that no dumping duty was assessable on the1 merchandise. Mitsui v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3828), Grand Gaslight v. United States (Reap. Dec. 3834), Sherwin-Williams v. United States (T. D. 47919), and Vulcan Match Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 398) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cust. Ct. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-822789-g-of-empire-importing-co-cusc-1941.