Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 427

United States Customs Court·Decided March 26, 1943·No. No. 48146·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Norgine F the same in all material respects as that passed upon in United States v. Betz (30 C. C. P. A. 16, C. A. D. 208), which case was incorporated herein, wherein it was held that the merchandise was not seaweeds, manufactured, but rather a manufacture of seaweeds. Since there is no provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 for a manufacture of seaweeds, the court held the merchandise in the incorporated case dutiable as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1558. On the stipulated facts the protests herein were accordingly sustained to that extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Norgine F the same in all material respects as that passed upon in United States v. Betz (30 C. C. P. A. 16, C. A. D. 208), which case was incorporated herein, wherein it was held that the merchandise was not seaweeds, manufactured, but rather a manufacture of seaweeds. Since there is no provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 for a manufacture of seaweeds, the court held the merchandise in the incorporated case dutiable as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1558. On the stipulated facts the protests herein were accordingly sustained to that extent.

Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 427 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 427 (Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.