Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 427
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 26, 1943
DocketNo. 48146
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 427 (Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 810327-G of Ernest E. Marks Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 427 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Norgine F the same in all material respects as that passed upon in United States v. Betz (30 C. C. P. A. 16, C. A. D. 208), which case was incorporated herein, wherein it was held that the merchandise was not seaweeds, manufactured, but rather a manufacture of seaweeds. Since there is no provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 for a manufacture of seaweeds, the court held the merchandise in the incorporated case dutiable as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1558. On the stipulated facts the protests herein were accordingly sustained to that extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-810327-g-of-ernest-e-marks-co-cusc-1943.