Protests 787903-G of Butler Bros.
5 Cust. Ct. 318
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 787903-G of Butler Bros., 5 Cust. Ct. 318 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 318 (Protests 787903-G of Butler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)