Protests 772664-G of Greenberg

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 772664-G of Greenberg

1 Cust. Ct. 444

United States Customs Court·Decided October 17, 1938·No. No. 39617·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) beach balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) rubber balls like those the subject of Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (3) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b); and (4) novelties in chief value of fur at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), Abstract 25607 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) beach balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) rubber balls like those the subject of Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (3) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b); and (4) novelties in chief value of fur at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), Abstract 25607 followed.

Protests 772664-G of Greenberg, 1 Cust. Ct. 444 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 444 (Protests 772664-G of Greenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.