Protests 768399-G of D. Lisner & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 768399-G of D. Lisner & Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 519

United States Customs Court·Decided December 6, 1938·No. No. 40021·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bottles, boxes, bookends, bottle holders, trays, inkstands, candelabra, vases, atomizers, and' urns chiefly used on the table or in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bottles, boxes, bookends, bottle holders, trays, inkstands, candelabra, vases, atomizers, and' urns chiefly used on the table or in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 768399-G of D. Lisner & Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 519 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 519 (Protests 768399-G of D. Lisner & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.