Protests 767289-G of Bailey

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 767289-G of Bailey

11 Cust. Ct. 301

United States Customs Court·Decided November 1, 1943·No. No. 48936·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the embossed metal buttons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237). Inasmuch as the merchandise in question was entered prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458) the lower rate referred to therein was held not applicable to the buttons in question. ’They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the embossed metal buttons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237). Inasmuch as the merchandise in question was entered prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458) the lower rate referred to therein was held not applicable to the buttons in question. ’They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed.

Protests 767289-G of Bailey, 11 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

11 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 767289-G of Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.