Protests 767289-G of Bailey

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 767289-G of Bailey

11 Cust. Ct. 301

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 1, 1943

DocketNo. 48936

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 767289-G of Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 767289-G of Bailey, 11 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the embossed metal buttons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237). Inasmuch as the merchandise in question was entered prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458) the lower rate referred to therein was held not applicable to the buttons in question. ’They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the embossed metal buttons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Bailey (30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237). Inasmuch as the merchandise in question was entered prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458) the lower rate referred to therein was held not applicable to the buttons in question. ’They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-767289-g-of-bailey-cusc-1943.