Protests 755136-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 755136-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 515

United States Customs Court·Decided January 3, 1939·No. No. 40283·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of novelties in chief value of rubber. They were held dutiable at 25 percent, under paragraph 1537 (b) on the authority of Abstract 25607. Uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of novelties in chief value of rubber. They were held dutiable at 25 percent, under paragraph 1537 (b) on the authority of Abstract 25607. Uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502.

Protests 755136-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 515 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 515 (Protests 755136-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.