Protests 737849-G of O. G. Hempstead & Son
5 Cust. Ct. 286
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 737849-G of O. G. Hempstead & Son, 5 Cust. Ct. 286 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 286 (Protests 737849-G of O. G. Hempstead & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)