Protests 730400-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.
5 Cust. Ct. 301
Opinion
[302]*302Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware the same as that passed upon in Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 730400-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 301 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 301 (Protests 730400-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)