Protests 718827-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 718827-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 726

United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1939·No. No. 41452·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770), May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) unin-flated rubber balls or so-called beach balls and tennis rackets were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph-1502. Paper puzzles similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1413.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770), May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) unin-flated rubber balls or so-called beach balls and tennis rackets were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph-1502. Paper puzzles similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1413.

Protests 718827-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 726 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 726 (Protests 718827-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.