Protests 711932-G of Pressner

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 711932-G of Pressner

4 Cust. Ct. 360

United States Customs Court·Decided January 9, 1940·No. No. 42976·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; (2) uninflated rubber balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (3) siren whistles and horns similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; aDd (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstract 25607 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; (2) uninflated rubber balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (3) siren whistles and horns similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; aDd (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstract 25607 followed.

Protests 711932-G of Pressner, 4 Cust. Ct. 360 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 360 (Protests 711932-G of Pressner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.