Protests 698285-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 698285-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

1 Cust. Ct. 442

United States Customs Court·Decided October 13, 1938·No. No. 39604·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, photo frames, and containers, articles chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, photo frames, and containers, articles chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 698285-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protests 698285-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.