Protests 671528-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 671528-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 575

United States Customs Court·Decided February 10, 1939·No. No. 40628·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, trays, bookends, vases, candelabra, inkstands, lamps, letter openers, inkwells, letter racks, desk pads, blotters, boxes, calendars, and bird cages chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), Heemsoth v. United States (T. D. 49191), and Abstracts 37730 and 34830 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, trays, bookends, vases, candelabra, inkstands, lamps, letter openers, inkwells, letter racks, desk pads, blotters, boxes, calendars, and bird cages chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), Heemsoth v. United States (T. D. 49191), and Abstracts 37730 and 34830 cited.

Protests 671528-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 575 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 575 (Protests 671528-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.