Protests 663213-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 663213-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 726

United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1939·No. No. 41451·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) balls similar to those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) and Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) tennis rackets similar to those the subject of May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and (3) candy containers at 35 percent under paragraph 1413, Abstract 33265 followed. • - -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) balls similar to those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) and Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) tennis rackets similar to those the subject of May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and (3) candy containers at 35 percent under paragraph 1413, Abstract 33265 followed. • - -

Protests 663213-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 726 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 726 (Protests 663213-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.