Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc.
10 Cust. Ct. 381
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that certain of the hats in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith, some of them were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 12% percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5). Protests sustained to that extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc., 10 Cust. Ct. 381 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 381 (Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)