Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc.

10 Cust. Ct. 381
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1943
DocketNo. 47953
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 381 (Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 662580-G of Henry Pollak, Inc., 10 Cust. Ct. 381 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the hats in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith, some of them were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 12% percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5). Protests sustained to that extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-662580-g-of-henry-pollak-inc-cusc-1943.