Protests 650136-G of Strauss Bros.
5 Cust. Ct. 329
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Dow v. United States (21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816) and Abstracts 34372, 34924, 34928, and 38680 the tape measures, glove driers, and curling irons in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 650136-G of Strauss Bros., 5 Cust. Ct. 329 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 329 (Protests 650136-G of Strauss Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 103 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)