Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker

5 Cust. Ct. 253

United States Customs Court·Decided June 19, 1940·No. No. 43980·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered wearing apparel1 similar to that involved in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those involved in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered wearing apparel1 similar to that involved in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those involved in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker, 5 Cust. Ct. 253 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

5 Cust. Ct. 253 (Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related