Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker

5 Cust. Ct. 253

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 19, 1940

DocketNo. 43980

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 253 (Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 64690-G of Wanamaker, 5 Cust. Ct. 253 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered wearing apparel1 similar to that involved in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those involved in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered wearing apparel1 similar to that involved in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those involved in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-64690-g-of-wanamaker-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack