Protests 638464-G of E. Dillingham, Inc.
1 Cust. Ct. 492
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel ■and on the authority of Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530) it was held that ■duty should have been taken on the number of board feet actually imported.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 638464-G of E. Dillingham, Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 492 (cusc 1938).
1 Cust. Ct. 492 (Protests 638464-G of E. Dillingham, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.