Protests 623140-G of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.
1 Cust. Ct. 505
Opinion
[506] Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of boxes, bookends, and atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 623140-G of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 505 (cusc 1938).
1 Cust. Ct. 505 (Protests 623140-G of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.